Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs GeForce GTX 1660 Super

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking161not rated
Place by popularity8not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation59.05no data
Power efficiency18.38no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU116TU102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date29 October 2019 (5 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $6,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14084608
Core clock speed1530 MHz1305 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate157.1449.3
Floating-point processing power5.027 TFLOPS14.38 TFLOPS
ROPs4896
TMUs88288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB24 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

NVENC+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.57.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 October 2019 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 24 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 260 Watt

GTX 1660 Super has an age advantage of 1 year, and 108% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Passive, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1660 Super and Quadro RTX 6000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Super is a desktop card while Quadro RTX 6000 Passive is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super
GeForce GTX 1660 Super
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 19749 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 9 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.