Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Max-Q
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 542 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | no data | 3.15 |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2021) | Polaris (2016−2019) |
| GPU code name | TU116 | Polaris 12 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | no data | 26 September 2019 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $199 |
| Current price | $1649 (7.2x MSRP) | $740 (3.7x MSRP) |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1140 MHz | 1082 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1335 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 6,600 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 65 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 41.44 |
Size and compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 229 mm | no data |
| Width | no data | MXM Module |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| HDMI | + | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | no data | 1.2.131 |
Advantages and disadvantages
| Cost | $229 | $199 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1660 Max-Q and Radeon Pro WX 3200. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Max-Q is a desktop card while Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
