ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit vs GeForce GTX 1660 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameTU116R350
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateno data1 March 2003 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed1140 MHz380 MHz
Boost clock speed1335 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data47 Watt
Texture fill rateno data3.040
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data128 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data9.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)9.0 (9_0)
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 12 nm 150 nm

GTX 1660 Max-Q has a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1660 Max-Q and Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Max-Q is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 22 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1660 Max-Q or Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.