Tesla X2090 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking351not rated
Place by popularity63not in top-100
Power efficiency26.05no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameTU117GF110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 April 2020 (5 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024512
Core clock speed1380 MHz651 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,700 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate99.8441.66
Floating-point processing power3.195 TFLOPS1.332 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs6464
L1 Cache1 MB1 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno dataMXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz924 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s177.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.140N/A
CUDA7.52.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 April 2020 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 225 Watt

GTX 1650 Mobile has an age advantage of 8 years, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 350% lower power consumption.

Tesla X2090, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile and Tesla X2090. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Tesla X2090 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
NVIDIA Tesla X2090
Tesla X2090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3786 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 14 votes

Rate Tesla X2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile or Tesla X2090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.