Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking351not rated
Place by popularity50not in top-100
Power efficiency26.17no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameTU117Pitcairn
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 April 2020 (5 years ago)13 March 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241024
Core clock speed1380 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz925 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate99.8459.20
Floating-point processing power3.195 TFLOPS1.894 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs6464
L1 Cache1 MB256 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s153.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1401.2.131
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 April 2020 13 March 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 150 Watt

GTX 1650 Mobile has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile and Radeon R9 270 1024SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R9 270 1024SP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3842 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon R9 270 1024SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile or Radeon R9 270 1024SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.