GeForce2 MX vs GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3521599
Place by popularity56not in top-100
Power efficiency26.14no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameTU117NV11 A2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 April 2020 (5 years ago)28 June 2000 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed1380 MHz175 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,700 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate99.840.7
Floating-point processing power3.195 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs644
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6SDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s2.656 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.140N/A
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 Mobile 7116
+355700%
GeForce2 MX 2
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58no data
1440p37no data
4K23no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 131 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 52 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 60 no data
Counter-Strike 2 113 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 41 no data
Escape from Tarkov 80 no data
Far Cry 5 60 no data
Fortnite 90−95 no data
Forza Horizon 4 82 no data
Forza Horizon 5 68 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70 no data
Valorant 164 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 60 no data
Counter-Strike 2 67 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 32 no data
Dota 2 96 no data
Escape from Tarkov 63 no data
Far Cry 5 54 no data
Fortnite 90−95 no data
Forza Horizon 4 80 no data
Forza Horizon 5 60 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 59 no data
Metro Exodus 33 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62 no data
Valorant 148 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 59 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30 no data
Dota 2 89 no data
Escape from Tarkov 54 no data
Far Cry 5 53 no data
Forza Horizon 4 62 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 71 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36 no data
Valorant 130−140 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 72 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30 no data
Metro Exodus 20 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170 no data
Valorant 159 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 47 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 15 no data
Escape from Tarkov 33 no data
Far Cry 5 35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 44 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35 no data
Metro Exodus 12 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21 no data
Valorant 90 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 25 no data
Counter-Strike 2 14−16 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5 no data
Dota 2 45 no data
Escape from Tarkov 16 no data
Far Cry 5 18 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−33 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 18−20 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 April 2020 28 June 2000
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 180 nm

GTX 1650 Mobile has an age advantage of 19 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile and GeForce2 MX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while GeForce2 MX is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX
GeForce2 MX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3874 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 27 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile or GeForce2 MX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.