Tesla M2090 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated463
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.61
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameTU117BGF110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 April 2020 (4 years ago)25 July 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024512
Core clock speed1380 MHz651 MHz
Boost clock speed1515 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,700 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate96.9641.66
Floating-point processing power3.103 TFLOPS1.332 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs6464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz924 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s177.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.140N/A
CUDA7.52.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 April 2020 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 250 Watt

GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh has an age advantage of 8 years, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

Tesla M2090, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh and Tesla M2090. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh is a notebook card while Tesla M2090 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh
NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Tesla M2090

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 160 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 30 votes

Rate Tesla M2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.