ATI Radeon 9800 XT Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameTU116R360
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 July 2020 (5 years ago)14 March 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896no data
Core clock speed1410 MHz412 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate89.043.296
Floating-point processing power2.849 TFLOPSno data
ROPs328
TMUs568
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP Pro 8x
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz365 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s23.36 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort2x DVI
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 July 2020 14 March 2004
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 60 Watt

GTX 1650 TU116 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9800 XT Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 33.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and Radeon 9800 XT Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
ATI Radeon 9800 XT Mac Edition
Radeon 9800 XT Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 97 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 XT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 or Radeon 9800 XT Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.