GRID K200 vs GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameTU116GK104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 July 2020 (5 years ago)28 June 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$235

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8961536
Core clock speed1410 MHz745 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate89.0495.36
Floating-point processing power2.849 TFLOPS2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs56128
L1 Cache896 KB128 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s160.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.21.1.126
CUDA7.53.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 July 2020 28 June 2013
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 225 Watt

GTX 1650 TU116 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 181.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and GRID K200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 is a desktop graphics card while GRID K200 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
NVIDIA GRID K200
GRID K200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 97 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GRID K200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 or GRID K200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.