NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon Pro 570

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in our rating
 
Value for money (0-100)
2.65
 
5.80
Architecture
Turing
 
GCN 4.0
GPU code name
TU116
 
Polaris 20
Market segment
Desktop
 
Workstation
Launch date
29 October 2019 (1 year ago)
 
5 June 2017 (4 years ago)
Price now
$544
 
$157

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores
1408
 
1792
Core clock speed
1530 MHz
 
1000 MHz
Boost clock speed
1725 MHz
 
1105 MHz
Number of transistors
6,600 million
 
5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
 
14 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)
100 Watt
 
120 Watt
Texture fill rate
138.0
 
123.8
Floating-point performance
no data
 
3,584 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
 
PCIe 3.0 x16
Length
229 mm
 
241 mm
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
 
None

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type
GDDR6
 
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
 
4 GB
Memory bus width
128 Bit
 
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
14000 MHz
 
6780 MHz
Memory bandwidth
192.0 GB/s
 
217.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
 
no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
 
No outputs
HDMI
+
 
-

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready
+
 
no data
Multi Monitor
+
 
no data

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX
12 (12_1)
 
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.5
 
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
 
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
 
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
 
1.2.131
CUDA
7.5
 
-

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 SUPER 37.60 +56.3%
Pro 570 24.05

Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 SUPER 9907 +56.4%
Pro 570 6336

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

GTX 1650 SUPER satisfies 100% minimum and 97% recommended requirements of all games known to us.

Minimum
100%
Recommended
97%
Minimum
100%
Recommended
97%

Pro 570 satisfies 97% minimum and 86% recommended requirements of all games known to us.

Minimum
97%
Recommended
86%
Minimum
97%
Recommended
86%

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

 
GTX 1650 SUPER
Pro 570
1080p
 
74
no data
1440p
 
41
no data
4K
 
27
no data

Competitors of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER from AMD

The nearest GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER's AMD equivalent is Radeon R9 FURY X, which is faster by 2% and higher by 2 positions in our rating.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER:

Competitors of Radeon Pro 570 from NVIDIA

The nearest Radeon Pro 570's NVIDIA equivalent is Quadro T1000, which is faster by 4% and higher by 2 positions in our rating.

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon Pro 570:

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

56.3% faster (about 1.5 times) in synthetic tests

Much newer (29 October 2019 vs 5 June 2017)

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 vs 14 nm)

Lower power consumption (100W vs 120W), meaning that the rival with higher TDP might require a better cooler or other thermal solution.

Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro 570

Cheaper ($157 vs $544)

Wider memory bus (256 vs 128 bit)

More pipelines (1792 vs 1408)

Higher memory bandwidth (217 vs 192 GB/s)

So, which one is the better GPU?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, since it shows better performance.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a desktop card while Radeon Pro 570 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
AMD Radeon Pro 570
Like
Like

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.