Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Nvidia 1050 3GB Mobile vs NVIDIA 1650 SUPER
Combined performance score
1650 SUPER outperforms 1050 3GB Mobile by 105% in our combined benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 189 | 360 |
Place by popularity | 50 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 27.05 | no data |
Architecture | Turing (2018−2021) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
GPU code name | TU116 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 29 October 2019 (4 years old) | April 2018 (5 years old) |
Current price | $206 | no data |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1366 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz | 1442 MHz |
Number of transistors | 6,600 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | no data |
Texture fill rate | 138.0 | no data |
Size and compatibility
Information on GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | no data |
Length | 229 mm | no data |
Width | 2-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 MB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 96 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 1752 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 84 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | no data |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | no data |
HDMI | + | no data |
G-SYNC support | no data | + |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
VR Ready | + | no data |
Multi-Projection | no data | + |
Multi Monitor | + | + |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | no data |
Shader Model | 6.5 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
OpenCL | 1.2 | no data |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | + |
CUDA | 7.5 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
1650 SUPER outperforms 1050 3GB Mobile by 105% in our combined benchmark results.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
1650 SUPER outperforms 1050 3GB Mobile by 91% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 72
+106%
| 35−40
−106%
|
1440p | 36
+125%
| 16−18
−125%
|
4K | 22
+120%
| 10−12
−120%
|
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 63
+110%
|
30−33
−110%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 50−55
+113%
|
24−27
−113%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 53
+121%
|
24−27
−121%
|
Battlefield 5 | 72
+106%
|
35−40
−106%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 65−70
+130%
|
30−33
−130%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 50
+108%
|
24−27
−108%
|
Far Cry 5 | 93
+107%
|
45−50
−107%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 89
+123%
|
40−45
−123%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 85−90
+118%
|
40−45
−118%
|
Hitman 3 | 105
+110%
|
50−55
−110%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 74
+111%
|
35−40
−111%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71
+137%
|
30−33
−137%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 85
+113%
|
40−45
−113%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 71
+137%
|
30−33
−137%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 50−55
+113%
|
24−27
−113%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 26
+117%
|
12−14
−117%
|
Battlefield 5 | 58
+115%
|
27−30
−115%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 65−70
+130%
|
30−33
−130%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 40
+122%
|
18−20
−122%
|
Far Cry 5 | 86
+115%
|
40−45
−115%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 83
+108%
|
40−45
−108%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 85−90
+118%
|
40−45
−118%
|
Hitman 3 | 83
+108%
|
40−45
−108%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 58
+115%
|
27−30
−115%
|
Metro Exodus | 51
+113%
|
24−27
−113%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30
+114%
|
14−16
−114%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 67
+123%
|
30−33
−123%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 90
+125%
|
40−45
−125%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 61
+126%
|
27−30
−126%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 50−55
+113%
|
24−27
−113%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 15
+114%
|
7−8
−114%
|
Battlefield 5 | 57
+111%
|
27−30
−111%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 34
+113%
|
16−18
−113%
|
Far Cry 5 | 79
+126%
|
35−40
−126%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 76
+117%
|
35−40
−117%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 85−90
+118%
|
40−45
−118%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 50
+108%
|
24−27
−108%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 21
+110%
|
10−11
−110%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 40−45
+128%
|
18−20
−128%
|
Hitman 3 | 51
+113%
|
24−27
−113%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 39
+117%
|
18−20
−117%
|
Metro Exodus | 29
+107%
|
14−16
−107%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 11
+120%
|
5−6
−120%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 40
+122%
|
18−20
−122%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 27−30
+133%
|
12−14
−133%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 13
+117%
|
6−7
−117%
|
Battlefield 5 | 42
+133%
|
18−20
−133%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 20
+122%
|
9−10
−122%
|
Far Cry 5 | 54
+125%
|
24−27
−125%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 55
+129%
|
24−27
−129%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+125%
|
24−27
−125%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
+129%
|
14−16
−129%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 14
+133%
|
6−7
−133%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 21−24
+110%
|
10−11
−110%
|
Hitman 3 | 25
+108%
|
12−14
−108%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 5
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
Metro Exodus | 16
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
+133%
|
6−7
−133%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 19
+111%
|
9−10
−111%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 32
+129%
|
14−16
−129%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 16−18
+113%
|
8−9
−113%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 5
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
Battlefield 5 | 24
+140%
|
10−11
−140%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
Far Cry 5 | 24
+140%
|
10−11
−140%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 28
+133%
|
12−14
−133%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+106%
|
18−20
−106%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 8
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
This is how GTX 1650 SUPER and Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile compete in popular games:
1080p resolution:
- GTX 1650 SUPER is 106% faster than Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
1440p resolution:
- GTX 1650 SUPER is 125% faster than Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
4K resolution:
- GTX 1650 SUPER is 120% faster than Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 26.17 | 12.75 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 MB |
Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.