Radeon R7 350 640SP vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking384not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency38.32no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameTU117Cape Verde
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 April 2019 (6 years ago)7 January 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024640
Core clock speed930 MHz925 MHz
Boost clock speed1125 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,700 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate72.0037.00
Floating-point processing power2.304 TFLOPS1.184 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs6440
L1 Cache1 MB160 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1751 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.1 GB/s72 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1401.2
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 April 2019 7 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 55 Watt

GTX 1650 Max-Q has an age advantage of 3 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 83.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and Radeon R7 350 640SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R7 350 640SP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP
Radeon R7 350 640SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 707 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Radeon R7 350 640SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q or Radeon R7 350 640SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.