Radeon Pro W5300M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking386not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency38.89no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameTU117Navi 14
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date23 April 2019 (6 years ago)13 November 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241280
Core clock speed930 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1125 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate72.00100.0
Floating-point processing power2.304 TFLOPS3.2 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs6480
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1751 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.1 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.2.131
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 April 2019 13 November 2019
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 85 Watt

GTX 1650 Max-Q has 183% lower power consumption.

Pro W5300M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and a 71% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and Radeon Pro W5300M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W5300M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 728 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro W5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q or Radeon Pro W5300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.