GeForce MX150 GP107 vs GTX 1650 Max-Q

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking332not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency36.91no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTU117GP107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)23 February 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024384
Core clock speed930 MHz1469 MHz
Boost clock speed1125 MHz1532 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate72.0036.77
Floating-point processing power2.304 TFLOPS1.177 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs6424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1751 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.1 GB/s48.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1401.2.131
CUDA7.56.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 April 2019 23 February 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 25 Watt

GTX 1650 Max-Q has an age advantage of 2 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

MX150 GP107, on the other hand, has 20% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and GeForce MX150 GP107. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 GP107
GeForce MX150 GP107

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 616 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 55 votes

Rate GeForce MX150 GP107 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.