ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 SE vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking384not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency38.44no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameTU117RV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 April 2019 (6 years ago)26 January 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed930 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1125 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,700 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Wattno data
Texture fill rate72.001.000
Floating-point processing power2.304 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs644
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1751 MHz164 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.1 GB/s2.624 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 2x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.140N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 April 2019 26 January 2004
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 150 nm

GTX 1650 Max-Q has an age advantage of 15 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and All-In-Wonder 9200 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder 9200 SE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 SE
All-In-Wonder 9200 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 707 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q or All-In-Wonder 9200 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.