Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB vs GeForce GTX 1080

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 and Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1080
2016
8 GB GDDR5X, 180 Watt
40.38

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB outperforms GTX 1080 by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10459
Place by popularity63not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.6588.12
Power efficiency15.4214.07
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP104Navi 22
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date27 May 2016 (8 years ago)17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $334

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB has 348% better value for money than GTX 1080.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602560
Core clock speed1607 MHz2321 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHz2581 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt250 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate277.3413.0
Floating-point processing power8.873 TFLOPS13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs160160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed10 GB/s2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1080 40.38
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB 51.14
+26.6%

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1080 15556
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB 19705
+26.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD127
−26%
160−170
+26%
1440p78
−21.8%
95−100
+21.8%
4K59
−18.6%
70−75
+18.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.72
−126%
2.09
+126%
1440p7.68
−118%
3.52
+118%
4K10.15
−113%
4.77
+113%
  • RX 6750 GRE 12 GB has 126% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6750 GRE 12 GB has 118% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6750 GRE 12 GB has 113% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 110−120
−25%
140−150
+25%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
−17.6%
100−105
+17.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−26.4%
110−120
+26.4%
Atomic Heart 110−120
−25%
140−150
+25%
Battlefield 5 166
−26.5%
210−220
+26.5%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
−17.6%
100−105
+17.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−26.4%
110−120
+26.4%
Far Cry 5 118
−18.6%
140−150
+18.6%
Fortnite 285
−22.8%
350−400
+22.8%
Forza Horizon 4 140
−21.4%
170−180
+21.4%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
−18.2%
130−140
+18.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 123
−22%
150−160
+22%
Valorant 220−230
−22.7%
270−280
+22.7%
Atomic Heart 110−120
−25%
140−150
+25%
Battlefield 5 142
−19.7%
170−180
+19.7%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
−17.6%
100−105
+17.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 272
−10.3%
300−310
+10.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−26.4%
110−120
+26.4%
Dota 2 102
−17.6%
120−130
+17.6%
Far Cry 5 113
−23.9%
140−150
+23.9%
Fortnite 199
−25.6%
250−260
+25.6%
Forza Horizon 4 137
−24.1%
170−180
+24.1%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
−18.2%
130−140
+18.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 119
−26.1%
150−160
+26.1%
Metro Exodus 74
−21.6%
90−95
+21.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 113
−23.9%
140−150
+23.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
−21.6%
90−95
+21.6%
Valorant 220−230
−22.7%
270−280
+22.7%
Battlefield 5 123
−22%
150−160
+22%
Counter-Strike 2 47
−17%
55−60
+17%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−26.4%
110−120
+26.4%
Dota 2 100
−20%
120−130
+20%
Far Cry 5 104
−25%
130−140
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 112
−25%
140−150
+25%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
−18.2%
130−140
+18.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 97
−23.7%
120−130
+23.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 81
−23.5%
100−105
+23.5%
Valorant 220−230
−22.7%
270−280
+22.7%
Fortnite 146
−23.3%
180−190
+23.3%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
−16.7%
300−310
+16.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 72
−25%
90−95
+25%
Metro Exodus 45
−22.2%
55−60
+22.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−23.5%
200−210
+23.5%
Valorant 250−260
−18.6%
300−310
+18.6%
Battlefield 5 98
−22.4%
120−130
+22.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−16.3%
50−55
+16.3%
Far Cry 5 77
−23.4%
95−100
+23.4%
Forza Horizon 4 93
−18.3%
110−120
+18.3%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
−21.2%
80−85
+21.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
−21.4%
85−90
+21.4%
Fortnite 95
−26.3%
120−130
+26.3%
Atomic Heart 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 74
−21.6%
90−95
+21.6%
Metro Exodus 28
−25%
35−40
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
−25%
70−75
+25%
Valorant 220−230
−22.8%
280−290
+22.8%
Battlefield 5 53
−22.6%
65−70
+22.6%
Counter-Strike 2 6
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Dota 2 129
−24%
160−170
+24%
Far Cry 5 42
−19%
50−55
+19%
Forza Horizon 4 65
−23.1%
80−85
+23.1%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−22%
50−55
+22%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 34
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%
Fortnite 46
−19.6%
55−60
+19.6%

This is how GTX 1080 and RX 6750 GRE 12 GB compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 26% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 22% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 19% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.38 51.14
Recency 27 May 2016 17 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 250 Watt

GTX 1080 has 38.9% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, on the other hand, has a 26.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1080 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
GeForce GTX 1080
AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4
5634 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2
172 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1080 or Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.