Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
FirePro D700 vs GeForce GTX 1080
Aggregated performance score
GTX 1080
2016
8 GB GDDR5X
40.09
+190%
FirePro D700
2014
6 GB GDDR5
13.83
GeForce GTX 1080 outperforms FirePro D700 by 190% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 94 | 346 |
| Place by popularity | 69 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 26.36 | 5.04 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
| GPU code name | Pascal GP104 | Tahiti |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 6 May 2016 (7 years old) | 18 January 2014 (10 years old) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | no data |
| Current price | $241 (0.4x MSRP) | $413 |
Value for money
GTX 1080 has 423% better value for money than FirePro D700.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 2048 |
| CUDA cores | 2560 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 7,200 million | 4,313 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 274 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 277.3 | 108.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | 3,482 gflops |
Size and compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 279 mm |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 8-pin | no data |
| SLI options | + | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10 GB/s | 5480 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 263.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
| Multi monitor support | + | no data |
| HDMI | + | no data |
| G-SYNC support | + | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| GPU Boost | 3.0 | no data |
| VR Ready | + | no data |
| Ansel | + | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 128
+220%
| 40−45
−220%
|
| 1440p | 77
+221%
| 24−27
−221%
|
| 4K | 58
+222%
| 18−21
−222%
|
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 70−75
+196%
|
24−27
−196%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 92
+207%
|
30−33
−207%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 70−75
+192%
|
24−27
−192%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 166
+202%
|
55−60
−202%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 134
+198%
|
45−50
−198%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 70−75
+196%
|
24−27
−196%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 118
+195%
|
40−45
−195%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 111
+217%
|
35−40
−217%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 140
+211%
|
45−50
−211%
|
| Hitman 3 | 120−130
+220%
|
40−45
−220%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 85−90
+190%
|
30−33
−190%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 96
+220%
|
30−33
−220%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 108
+209%
|
35−40
−209%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 70−75
+208%
|
24−27
−208%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 83
+207%
|
27−30
−207%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 70−75
+192%
|
24−27
−192%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 142
+216%
|
45−50
−216%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 113
+223%
|
35−40
−223%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 70−75
+196%
|
24−27
−196%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 113
+223%
|
35−40
−223%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 108
+209%
|
35−40
−209%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 137
+204%
|
45−50
−204%
|
| Hitman 3 | 120−130
+220%
|
40−45
−220%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 85−90
+190%
|
30−33
−190%
|
| Metro Exodus | 74
+208%
|
24−27
−208%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 53
+194%
|
18−20
−194%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 98
+227%
|
30−33
−227%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 74
+208%
|
24−27
−208%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 70−75
+208%
|
24−27
−208%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 63
+200%
|
21−24
−200%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 70−75
+192%
|
24−27
−192%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 123
+208%
|
40−45
−208%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 70−75
+196%
|
24−27
−196%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 104
+197%
|
35−40
−197%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 98
+227%
|
30−33
−227%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 112
+220%
|
35−40
−220%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 81
+200%
|
27−30
−200%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 70−75
+208%
|
24−27
−208%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 74
+208%
|
24−27
−208%
|
| Hitman 3 | 75−80
+213%
|
24−27
−213%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 55−60
+217%
|
18−20
−217%
|
| Metro Exodus | 45
+221%
|
14−16
−221%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 35
+192%
|
12−14
−192%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 64
+205%
|
21−24
−205%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 49
+206%
|
16−18
−206%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 45−50
+221%
|
14−16
−221%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 98
+227%
|
30−33
−227%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+220%
|
10−11
−220%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 77
+221%
|
24−27
−221%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 82
+204%
|
27−30
−204%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 93
+210%
|
30−33
−210%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 55−60
+222%
|
18−20
−222%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
+200%
|
12−14
−200%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 42
+200%
|
14−16
−200%
|
| Hitman 3 | 40−45
+193%
|
14−16
−193%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35
+210%
|
10−11
−210%
|
| Metro Exodus | 28
+211%
|
9−10
−211%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 21
+200%
|
7−8
−200%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 32
+220%
|
10−11
−220%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 56
+211%
|
18−20
−211%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 33
+230%
|
10−11
−230%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 24−27
+213%
|
8−9
−213%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 53
+194%
|
18−20
−194%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+250%
|
4−5
−250%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 42
+200%
|
14−16
−200%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 47
+194%
|
16−18
−194%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65
+210%
|
21−24
−210%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 21−24
+200%
|
7−8
−200%
|
This is how GTX 1080 and FirePro D700 compete in popular games:
1080p resolution:
- GTX 1080 is 220% faster than FirePro D700
1440p resolution:
- GTX 1080 is 221% faster than FirePro D700
4K resolution:
- GTX 1080 is 222% faster than FirePro D700
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 40.09 | 13.83 |
| Recency | 6 May 2016 | 18 January 2014 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Chip lithography | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 274 Watt |
The GeForce GTX 1080 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro D700 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 is a desktop card while FirePro D700 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
