Arctic Sound-M vs GeForce GTX 1080

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking103not rated
Place by popularity49not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.50no data
Power efficiency15.59no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGP104Arctic Sound
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date27 May 2016 (8 years ago)2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25608192
Core clock speed1607 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt500 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate277.3230.4
Floating-point processing power8.873 TFLOPS14.75 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs160256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin8-pin EPS
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XHBM2e
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed10 GB/s1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s1.23 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 500 Watt

GTX 1080 has 177.8% lower power consumption.

Arctic Sound-M, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1080 and Arctic Sound-M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 is a desktop card while Arctic Sound-M is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
GeForce GTX 1080
Intel Arctic Sound-M
Arctic Sound-M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 5277 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.