Radeon HD 8650M vs GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTX 1080 Mobile
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
35.58
+1773%

GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile outperforms Radeon HD 8650M by a whopping 1773% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking129868
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation91.850.13
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code nameN17E-G3no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date16 August 2016 (7 years ago)7 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499.99 no data
Current price$230 (0.5x MSRP)$338

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1080 Mobile has 70554% better value for money than HD 8650M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560384
CUDA cores2560no data
Core clock speed1607 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million900 Million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate283.4no data
Floating-point performance9,068 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile and Radeon HD 8650M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed10 GB/s4500 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVIno data
Multi monitor support+no data
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1080 Mobile 35.58
+1773%
HD 8650M 1.90

GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile outperforms Radeon HD 8650M by 1773% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1080 Mobile 21394
+1938%
HD 8650M 1050

GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile outperforms Radeon HD 8650M by 1938% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1080 Mobile 126690
+1589%
HD 8650M 7500

GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile outperforms Radeon HD 8650M by 1589% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD113
+1783%
6−7
−1783%
1440p69
+2200%
3−4
−2200%
4K55
+2650%
2−3
−2650%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+1425%
4−5
−1425%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 59
+2850%
2−3
−2850%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 78
+1850%
4−5
−1850%
Battlefield 5 115
+11400%
1−2
−11400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 93
+2225%
4−5
−2225%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+1425%
4−5
−1425%
Far Cry 5 97
+1113%
8−9
−1113%
Far Cry New Dawn 129
+6350%
2−3
−6350%
Forza Horizon 4 108
+1443%
7−8
−1443%
Hitman 3 85−90
+1680%
5−6
−1680%
Horizon Zero Dawn 194
+1286%
14−16
−1286%
Metro Exodus 140
+1900%
7−8
−1900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 92
+2200%
4−5
−2200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+982%
10−12
−982%
Watch Dogs: Legion 77
+7600%
1−2
−7600%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 52
+2500%
2−3
−2500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 68
+2167%
3−4
−2167%
Battlefield 5 107
+10600%
1−2
−10600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120
+2900%
4−5
−2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+1425%
4−5
−1425%
Far Cry 5 67
+738%
8−9
−738%
Far Cry New Dawn 91
+4450%
2−3
−4450%
Forza Horizon 4 106
+1414%
7−8
−1414%
Hitman 3 75
+1400%
5−6
−1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 178
+1171%
14−16
−1171%
Metro Exodus 85
+2025%
4−5
−2025%
Red Dead Redemption 2 87
+2075%
4−5
−2075%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 42
+282%
10−12
−282%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142
+2740%
5−6
−2740%
Watch Dogs: Legion 68
+6700%
1−2
−6700%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 53
+2550%
2−3
−2550%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 59
+1867%
3−4
−1867%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 66
+1550%
4−5
−1550%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+1425%
4−5
−1425%
Far Cry 5 77
+863%
8−9
−863%
Forza Horizon 4 102
+1357%
7−8
−1357%
Horizon Zero Dawn 123
+779%
14−16
−779%
Metro Exodus 77
+1825%
4−5
−1825%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+1380%
5−6
−1380%
Watch Dogs: Legion 51
+5000%
1−2
−5000%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 83
+1975%
4−5
−1975%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80
+2567%
3−4
−2567%
Far Cry New Dawn 85
+4150%
2−3
−4150%
Hitman 3 52
+2500%
2−3
−2500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 32 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 42
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 46
+2200%
2−3
−2200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 66
+1550%
4−5
−1550%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Far Cry 5 74
+2367%
3−4
−2367%
Forza Horizon 4 87
+4250%
2−3
−4250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 89
+1383%
6−7
−1383%
Metro Exodus 74
+2367%
3−4
−2367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+2025%
4−5
−2025%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+2350%
2−3
−2350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 37 0−1

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 55−60
+729%
7−8
−729%
Far Cry New Dawn 45
+2150%
2−3
−2150%
Hitman 3 34
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+2100%
2−3
−2100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 31
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+2450%
2−3
−2450%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 31
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27 0−1
Battlefield 5 52
+2500%
2−3
−2500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 61
+1933%
3−4
−1933%
Horizon Zero Dawn 54
+2600%
2−3
−2600%
Metro Exodus 45
+1025%
4−5
−1025%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 39
+1200%
3−4
−1200%

This is how GTX 1080 Mobile and HD 8650M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 Mobile is 1783% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 Mobile is 2200% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 Mobile is 2650% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1080 Mobile is 11400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1080 Mobile surpassed HD 8650M in all 49 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.58 1.90
Recency 16 August 2016 7 January 2013
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm

The GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8650M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
AMD Radeon HD 8650M
Radeon HD 8650M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 308 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 10 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.