T400 vs GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile with T400, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
2016
2x 8 GB GDDR5
34.59
+306%

1080 SLI Mobile outperforms T400 by a whopping 306% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking163532
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.10
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLITU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date16 August 2016 (9 years ago)6 May 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5120384
Core clock speed1556 MHz420 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors14400 Million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data30 Watt
Texture fill rateno data34.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.094 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data24
L1 Cacheno data384 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data3x mini-DisplayPort
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA+7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD137
+357%
30−35
−357%
4K95
+352%
21−24
−352%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+340%
45−50
−340%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+350%
18−20
−350%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
+317%
30−33
−317%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+340%
45−50
−340%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+350%
18−20
−350%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+341%
27−30
−341%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+322%
27−30
−322%
Fortnite 150−160
+346%
35−40
−346%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+357%
30−33
−357%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+315%
27−30
−315%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+370%
30−33
−370%
Valorant 210−220
+326%
50−55
−326%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130
+317%
30−33
−317%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+340%
45−50
−340%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+328%
65−70
−328%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+350%
18−20
−350%
Dota 2 140−150
+370%
30−33
−370%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+341%
27−30
−341%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+322%
27−30
−322%
Fortnite 150−160
+346%
35−40
−346%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+357%
30−33
−357%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+315%
27−30
−315%
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130
+348%
27−30
−348%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+361%
18−20
−361%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+370%
30−33
−370%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 181
+353%
40−45
−353%
Valorant 210−220
+326%
50−55
−326%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+317%
30−33
−317%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+350%
18−20
−350%
Dota 2 140−150
+370%
30−33
−370%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+341%
27−30
−341%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+322%
27−30
−322%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+357%
30−33
−357%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+370%
30−33
−370%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 115
+326%
27−30
−326%
Valorant 210−220
+326%
50−55
−326%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+346%
35−40
−346%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+310%
21−24
−310%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+313%
60−65
−313%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+350%
16−18
−350%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+325%
12−14
−325%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+338%
40−45
−338%
Valorant 240−250
+310%
60−65
−310%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+338%
21−24
−338%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+344%
9−10
−344%
Escape from Tarkov 85−90
+372%
18−20
−372%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+372%
18−20
−372%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+313%
24−27
−313%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+306%
16−18
−306%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 90−95
+338%
21−24
−338%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+344%
9−10
−344%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+317%
18−20
−317%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+357%
7−8
−357%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 87
+314%
21−24
−314%
Valorant 210−220
+332%
50−55
−332%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+367%
12−14
−367%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+344%
9−10
−344%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Dota 2 100−110
+333%
24−27
−333%
Escape from Tarkov 40−45
+320%
10−11
−320%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+350%
10−11
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+313%
16−18
−313%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+350%
10−11
−350%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+340%
10−11
−340%

This is how GTX 1080 SLI Mobile and T400 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is 357% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is 352% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.59 8.52
Recency 16 August 2016 6 May 2021
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm

GTX 1080 SLI Mobile has a 306% higher aggregate performance score.

T400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the T400 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is a notebook graphics card while T400 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
NVIDIA T400
T400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.6 3243 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 410 votes

Rate T400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile or T400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.