GRID M3-3020 vs GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile

#ad
Buy
VS

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking116487
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money66.38no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLIGM107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date16 August 2016 (7 years old)18 May 2016 (7 years old)
Current price$352 no data
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5120640
Core clock speed1556 MHz1033 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHz1306 MHz
Number of transistors14400 Million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Texture fill rateno data52.24
Floating-point performanceno data1,672 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile and GRID M3-3020 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz5200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data83.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
G-SYNC support+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan+1.1.126
CUDA+5.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD137
+407%
27−30
−407%
4K89
+394%
18−20
−394%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+450%
12−14
−450%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+458%
12−14
−458%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+450%
12−14
−450%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+424%
21−24
−424%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+467%
18−20
−467%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+450%
12−14
−450%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+433%
18−20
−433%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+406%
18−20
−406%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+457%
21−24
−457%
Hitman 3 110−120
+396%
24−27
−396%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+406%
16−18
−406%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+400%
12−14
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
+400%
18−20
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+400%
14−16
−400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+458%
12−14
−458%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+450%
12−14
−450%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+424%
21−24
−424%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+467%
18−20
−467%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+450%
12−14
−450%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+433%
18−20
−433%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+406%
18−20
−406%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+457%
21−24
−457%
Hitman 3 110−120
+396%
24−27
−396%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+406%
16−18
−406%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+458%
12−14
−458%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+400%
12−14
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
+400%
18−20
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 181
+417%
35−40
−417%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+400%
14−16
−400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+458%
12−14
−458%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+450%
12−14
−450%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+424%
21−24
−424%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+450%
12−14
−450%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+433%
18−20
−433%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+406%
18−20
−406%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+457%
21−24
−457%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 115
+448%
21−24
−448%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+400%
14−16
−400%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+417%
12−14
−417%
Hitman 3 65−70
+393%
14−16
−393%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+430%
10−11
−430%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+413%
8−9
−413%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+400%
6−7
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+460%
10−11
−460%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+413%
8−9
−413%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+425%
8−9
−425%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+394%
16−18
−394%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+480%
5−6
−480%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+467%
12−14
−467%
Far Cry New Dawn 70−75
+407%
14−16
−407%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+400%
16−18
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+460%
10−11
−460%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+450%
6−7
−450%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+450%
6−7
−450%
Hitman 3 35−40
+429%
7−8
−429%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+420%
5−6
−420%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+480%
5−6
−480%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 87
+444%
16−18
−444%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+420%
5−6
−420%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+411%
9−10
−411%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+457%
7−8
−457%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+420%
10−11
−420%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%

This is how GTX 1080 SLI Mobile and GRID M3-3020 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is 407% faster than GRID M3-3020

4K resolution:

  • GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is 394% faster than GRID M3-3020

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 37.47 7.62
Recency 16 August 2016 18 May 2016
Memory bus width 256 128
Pipelines / CUDA cores 5120 640
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm

The GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID M3-3020 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is a notebook card while GRID M3-3020 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your own vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
GRID M3-3020

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.6 3048 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.