ATI Rage 128 Ultra vs GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking257not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.46no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Rage 4 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameGP104Rage 4
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date27 June 2017 (8 years ago)1 August 1999 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560no data
Core clock speed1290 MHz119 MHz
Boost clock speed1468 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rate234.90.24
Floating-point processing power7.516 TFLOPSno data
ROPs642
TMUs1602
L1 Cache960 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XSDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1251 MHz119 MHz
Memory bandwidth320.3 GB/s952.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)6.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 June 2017 1 August 1999
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 250 nm

GTX 1080 Max-Q has an age advantage of 17 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1462.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q and Rage 128 Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q is a notebook graphics card while Rage 128 Ultra is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
ATI Rage 128 Ultra
Rage 128 Ultra

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 46 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Rage 128 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q or Rage 128 Ultra, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.