ATI Radeon IGP 340M vs GeForce GTX 1070

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	186	1605
Place by popularity	30	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	20.64	no data
Power efficiency	16.58	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code name	GP104	RS200
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	10 June 2016 (9 years ago)	5 October 2002 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$379	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1920	2
Core clock speed	1506 MHz	183 MHz
Boost clock speed	1683 MHz	180 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	30 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	no data
Maximum GPU temperature	94 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	202.0	0.37
Floating-point processing power	6.463 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	64	2
TMUs	120	2
L1 Cache	720 KB	no data
L2 Cache	2 MB	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	AGP 4x
Length	267 mm	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Recommended system power (PSU)	500 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	256 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	8 GB/s	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	256 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	-
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost	3.0	no data
VR Ready	+	no data
Ansel	+	-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	7.0
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.5	1.4
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	+	N/A
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	117	no data
1440p	69	no data
4K	49	no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.24	no data
1440p	5.49	no data
4K	7.73	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	10 June 2016	5 October 2002
Chip lithography	16 nm	180 nm