GeForce2 MX vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	161	1588
Place by popularity	80	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	22.10	no data
Power efficiency	14.94	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code name	GP104	NV11 A2
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	2 November 2017 (7 years ago)	28 June 2000 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2432	no data
Core clock speed	1607 MHz	175 MHz
Boost clock speed	1683 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	7,200 million	20 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	180 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	255.8	0.7
Floating-point processing power	8.186 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	64	2
TMUs	152	4
L1 Cache	912 KB	no data
L2 Cache	2 MB	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	AGP 4x
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	SDR
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	32 MB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2002 MHz	166 MHz
Memory bandwidth	256.3 GB/s	2.656 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x VGA
HDMI	+	-
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

+

no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	7.0
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.2
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	112	no data
1440p	72	no data
4K	55	no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.56	no data
1440p	5.54	no data
4K	7.25	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	2 November 2017	28 June 2000
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	32 MB
Chip lithography	16 nm	180 nm

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---