GMA 3150 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1601594
Place by popularity89not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation22.91no data
Power efficiency14.96no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameGP104Pineview
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 November 2017 (8 years ago)9 May 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores243216
Core clock speed1607 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million123 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate255.80.8
Floating-point processing power8.186 TFLOPS0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs641
TMUs1522
L1 Cache912 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2002 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth256.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1070 Ti 14672
+733500%
Samples: 12088
GMA 3150 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD112no data
1440p72no data
4K55no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.56no data
1440p5.54no data
4K7.25no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 190−200 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130 no data
Counter-Strike 2 190−200 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85 no data
Escape from Tarkov 110−120 no data
Far Cry 5 114 no data
Fortnite 150−160 no data
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 no data
Forza Horizon 5 110−120 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150 no data
Valorant 210−220 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130 no data
Counter-Strike 2 190−200 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85 no data
Dota 2 127 no data
Escape from Tarkov 110−120 no data
Far Cry 5 108 no data
Fortnite 150−160 no data
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 no data
Forza Horizon 5 110−120 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130 no data
Metro Exodus 66 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130 no data
Valorant 210−220 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 111 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85 no data
Dota 2 121 no data
Escape from Tarkov 110−120 no data
Far Cry 5 102 no data
Forza Horizon 4 100 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72 no data
Valorant 210−220 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 109 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 85−90 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75 no data
Metro Exodus 40 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 240−250 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 83 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 no data
Escape from Tarkov 85−90 no data
Far Cry 5 75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 81 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 72 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 67 no data
Metro Exodus 25 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47 no data
Valorant 210−220 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 47 no data
Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Dota 2 105 no data
Escape from Tarkov 40−45 no data
Far Cry 5 39 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 36 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 November 2017 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 16 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 13 Watt

GTX 1070 Ti has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3150, on the other hand, has 1284.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is a desktop graphics card while GMA 3150 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Intel GMA 3150
GMA 3150

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 4596 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 174 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1070 Ti or GMA 3150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.