Radeon Pro V520 vs GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated172
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.84
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGP104Navi 12
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date18 October 2018 (6 years ago)1 December 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802304
Core clock speed1506 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1709 MHz1600 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate136.7230.4
Floating-point processing power4.375 TFLOPS7.373 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs80144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length250 mm267 mm
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XHBM2
Maximum RAM amount6 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 October 2018 1 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 225 Watt

GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X has 87.5% lower power consumption.

Pro V520, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X and Radeon Pro V520. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X is a desktop card while Radeon Pro V520 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X
AMD Radeon Pro V520
Radeon Pro V520

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 185 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.