Radeon PRO V710 vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking236not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.65no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP106Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date26 December 2017 (6 years ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12803456
Core clock speed1506 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed1709 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate136.7432.0
Floating-point processing power4.375 TFLOPS27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs4096
TMUs80216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length250 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount5 GB28 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speed2002 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.2 GB/s504.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 December 2017 3 October 2024
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 28 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 158 Watt

GTX 1060 5 GB has 31.7% lower power consumption.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 460% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB and Radeon PRO V710. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB is a desktop card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 648 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.