ATI Radeon 9200 SE vs GeForce GTX 1050

#ad 
Buy
GTX 1050 GTX 1050 3 GB GTX 1050 Ti GTX 1060 3 GB GTX 1060 3 GB GP104 GTX 1060 5 GB GTX 1060 6 GB GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X GTX 1060 6 GB GP104 GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 GTX 1060 8 GB GDDR5X GTX 1070 GTX 1070 GDDR5X GTX 1070 SLI GTX 1070 Ti GTX 1080 GTX 1080 11Gbps GTX 1080 Ti GTX 1080 Ti 12 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy
All-In-Wonder 9200 All-In-Wonder 9200 LE All-In-Wonder 9200 SE FireMV 2200 PCI Radeon 9200 Radeon 9200 LE Radeon 9200 PCI Radeon 9200 PRO Radeon 9200 SE Radeon 9200 SE PCI Radeon 9250 Radeon 9250 PCI

Contents

GTX 1050 GTX 1050
ATI 9200 SE 9200 SE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4001540
Place by popularity16not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.81no data
Power efficiency11.85no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGP107RV280
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 October 2016 (8 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1290 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed1392 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt28 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate58.200.8
Floating-point processing power1.862 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs404

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length145 mmno data
Height4.38" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)300 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI-no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s2.656 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
HDCP2.2-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.51.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 5028
+251300%
ATI 9200 SE 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44no data
1440p22no data
4K23no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.48no data
1440p4.95no data
4K4.74no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35 no data
Counter-Strike 2 65−70 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35 no data
Battlefield 5 56 no data
Counter-Strike 2 65−70 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 40−45 no data
Fortnite 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 5 35−40 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 no data
Valorant 100−110 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35 no data
Battlefield 5 43 no data
Counter-Strike 2 65−70 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Dota 2 124 no data
Far Cry 5 40−45 no data
Fortnite 53 no data
Forza Horizon 4 49 no data
Forza Horizon 5 35−40 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 53 no data
Metro Exodus 17 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38 no data
Valorant 100−110 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 36 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Dota 2 112 no data
Far Cry 5 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 4 34 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20 no data
Valorant 28 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 42 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 90−95 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 7 no data
Metro Exodus 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 no data
Valorant 130−140 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−33 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27 no data

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11 no data
Counter-Strike 2 7−8 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 24 no data
Metro Exodus 8−9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15 no data
Valorant 65−70 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18 no data
Counter-Strike 2 7−8 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Dota 2 47 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14 no data

Pros & cons summary

Recency 25 October 2016 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 28 Watt

GTX 1050 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 SE, on the other hand, has 167.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1050 and Radeon 9200 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
GeForce GTX 1050
ATI Radeon 9200 SE
Radeon 9200 SE
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 1050 GeForce GTX 1050
vs
GTX 1050 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
ATI 9200 SE Radeon 9200 SE
vs
HD 7970 GHz Edition Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition
GTX 1050 GeForce GTX 1050
vs
GTX 1630 GeForce GTX 1630
GTX 1050 GeForce GTX 1050
vs
HD 8730 OEM Radeon HD 8730 OEM
GTX 1050 GeForce GTX 1050
vs
HD 6530 Radeon HD 6530
GTX 1050 GeForce GTX 1050
vs
FirePro S7150 FirePro S7150
GTX 1050 GeForce GTX 1050
vs
ATI HD 4700 Radeon HD 4700
GTX 1050 GeForce GTX 1050
vs
ATI 9250 Radeon 9250
GTX 1050 GeForce GTX 1050
vs
ATI 9200 SE PCI Radeon 9200 SE PCI
GTX 1050 GeForce GTX 1050
vs
ATI FireGL V5100 FireGL V5100
GTX 1050 GeForce GTX 1050
vs
A10G A10G
GTX 580 GeForce GTX 580
vs
HD 7610M Radeon HD 7610M
GTX 580 GeForce GTX 580
vs
GeForce 610M GeForce 610M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 6090 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 69 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1050 or Radeon 9200 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.