Arc Pro A60 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated233
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.74
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGP107DG2-256
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 February 2019 (5 years ago)6 June 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682048
Core clock speed1366 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1442 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate69.22262.4
Floating-point processing power2.215 TFLOPS8.397 TFLOPS
ROPs2464
TMUs48128
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB12 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth84.1 GB/s384.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.0

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2019 6 June 2023
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 130 Watt

GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB has 73.3% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro A60, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB and Arc Pro A60. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is a notebook card while Arc Pro A60 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
Intel Arc Pro A60
Arc Pro A60

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 51 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 23 votes

Rate Arc Pro A60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.