ATI Radeon 7000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3461547
Place by popularity6not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.18no data
Power efficiency14.97no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGP107RV100
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 October 2016 (8 years ago)19 February 2001 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$139 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed1291 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed1392 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt23 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate66.820.55
Floating-point processing power2.138 TFLOPSno data
ROPs321
TMUs483

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length145 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz183 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s2.928 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Ansel+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 Ti 6325
+316150%
ATI 7000 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50no data
1440p30no data
4K26no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.78no data
1440p4.63no data
4K5.35no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45 no data
Counter-Strike 2 85−90 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45 no data
Battlefield 5 63 no data
Counter-Strike 2 85−90 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 50−55 no data
Fortnite 85−90 no data
Forza Horizon 4 69 no data
Forza Horizon 5 45−50 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55 no data
Valorant 120−130 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45 no data
Battlefield 5 52 no data
Counter-Strike 2 85−90 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Dota 2 141 no data
Far Cry 5 50−55 no data
Fortnite 65 no data
Forza Horizon 4 64 no data
Forza Horizon 5 45−50 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 64 no data
Metro Exodus 26 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 49 no data
Valorant 120−130 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 51 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Dota 2 125 no data
Far Cry 5 36 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 36 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26 no data
Valorant 53 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 29 no data
Metro Exodus 18−20 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150 no data
Valorant 150−160 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 36 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35 no data

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14 no data
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 28 no data
Metro Exodus 9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 no data
Valorant 85−90 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18 no data
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 no data
Dota 2 63 no data
Far Cry 5 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 4 20 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 11 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 13 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 October 2016 19 February 2001
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 23 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti has an age advantage of 15 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7000, on the other hand, has 226.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Radeon 7000. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
ATI Radeon 7000
Radeon 7000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 208208 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 196 votes

Rate Radeon 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1050 Ti or Radeon 7000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.