Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking345not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.19no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGP107Raven
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)23 April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768704
Core clock speed1493 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt35 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate77.7655.00
Floating-point processing power2.488 TFLOPS1.76 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs4844

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed7 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth112 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2017 23 April 2018
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 35 Watt

RX Vega 11 Efficient has an age advantage of 1 year, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient
Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 811 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 16 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 Efficient on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.