AeroBox GPU vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking434not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.75no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGP107Kryptos
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2018 (6 years ago)13 March 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640896
Core clock speed1190 MHz935 MHz
Boost clock speed1328 MHz985 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate53.1255.16
Floating-point processing power1.7 TFLOPS1.765 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4056

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz1066 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.1 GB/s68.22 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2018 13 March 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 100 Watt

GTX 1050 Max-Q has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

AeroBox GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q and AeroBox GPU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
AMD AeroBox GPU
AeroBox GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 251 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 679 votes

Rate AeroBox GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.