Tesla PG503-216 vs GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGP107GV100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 February 2019 (6 years ago)26 November 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7684608
Core clock speed1366 MHz1312 MHz
Boost clock speed1442 MHz1530 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate69.22440.6
Floating-point processing power2.215 TFLOPS14.1 TFLOPS
ROPs24128
TMUs48288
Tensor Coresno data640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount3 GB32 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz1106 MHz
Memory bandwidth84.1 GB/s1.13 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.17.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2019 26 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 250 Watt

GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q has 233.3% lower power consumption.

Tesla PG503-216, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, a 966.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q and Tesla PG503-216. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q is a notebook graphics card while Tesla PG503-216 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q
NVIDIA Tesla PG503-216
Tesla PG503-216

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 23 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.3 3 votes

Rate Tesla PG503-216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q or Tesla PG503-216, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.