Radeon Sky 500 vs GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated459
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data5.80
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGF116Pitcairn
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date11 July 2012 (13 years ago)27 March 2013 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1441280
Core clock speed783 MHz950 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)106 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate18.7976.00
Floating-point processing power0.451 TFLOPS2.432 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs2480
L1 Cache192 KB320 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length210 mm242 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s154 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI1x DisplayPort
HDMI+-
DisplayPort countno data1
Dual-link DVI support-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 July 2012 27 March 2013
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 106 Watt 150 Watt

GTS 450 Rev. 3 has 42% lower power consumption.

Sky 500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 and Radeon Sky 500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Sky 500 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 50 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 15 votes

Rate Radeon Sky 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 or Radeon Sky 500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.