Radeon Pro 575X vs GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGF116Polaris 20
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date11 July 2012 (13 years ago)18 March 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1442048
Core clock speed783 MHz1096 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)106 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate18.79140.3
Floating-point processing power0.451 TFLOPS4.489 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs24128
L1 Cache192 KB512 KB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1700 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s217.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 July 2012 18 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 106 Watt 120 Watt

GTS 450 Rev. 3 has 13% lower power consumption.

Pro 575X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 186% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 and Radeon Pro 575X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro 575X is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 48 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 25 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 or Radeon Pro 575X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.