H3C XG310 vs GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameGF116DG1
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date11 July 2012 (13 years ago)11 November 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores144768 ×4
Core clock speed783 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)106 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate18.7952.80 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.451 TFLOPS1.69 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs1624 ×4
TMUs2448 ×4
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB ×4
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed700 MHz2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s68.26 GB/s ×4

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 July 2012 11 November 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 106 Watt 300 Watt

GTS 450 Rev. 3 has 183% lower power consumption.

H3C XG310, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 and H3C XG310. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 is a desktop graphics card while H3C XG310 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
Intel H3C XG310
H3C XG310

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 46 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7 votes

Rate H3C XG310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 or H3C XG310, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.