AeroBox GPU vs GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

GTS 240 OEM GTS 250 GTS 450 GTS 450 OEM GTS 450 Rev. 2 GTS 450 Rev. 3
VS

Contents

GTS 450 Rev. 2 GTS 450 Rev. 2
AeroBox GPU AeroBox GPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking666not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.90no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGF116Kryptos
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 March 2011 (13 years ago)13 March 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192896
Core clock speed783 MHz935 MHz
Boost clock speedno data985 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)106 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate25.0655.16
Floating-point processing power0.6013 TFLOPS1.765 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs3256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed902 MHz1066 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.73 GB/s68.22 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary

Recency 15 March 2011 13 March 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 106 Watt 100 Watt

AeroBox GPU has an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 and AeroBox GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is a desktop card while AeroBox GPU is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
AMD AeroBox GPU
AeroBox GPU
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
HD 7750 Radeon HD 7750
AeroBox GPU AeroBox GPU
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5750 Mobility Radeon HD 5750
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
ATI HD 5770 Radeon HD 5770
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
PCX 5900 GeForce PCX 5900
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
Vega 8 Efficient Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
RX 580 2048SP Radeon RX 580 2048SP
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
GeForce MX230 GeForce MX230
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
ATI M28 M28
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
RTX 3060 Mobile GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 6700 XT
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
Arc A580 Arc A580
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 295 Single PCB GeForce GTX 295 Single PCB
GTS 450 Rev. 2 GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
vs
RTX 4090 D GeForce RTX 4090 D

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 39 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 679 votes

Rate AeroBox GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.