GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile vs GTS 250M

Place in performance ranking	949	120
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	0.09	no data
Architecture	GT2xx (2009−2012)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	N10E-GE	GN20-E5 GA104
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 June 2009 (14 years old)	4 January 2021 (3 years old)
Current price	$230	no data

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	5120
CUDA cores	96	no data
Core clock speed	500 MHz	780 - 1100 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1290 - 1620 MHz
Number of transistors	727 million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	125 Watt
Texture fill rate	16.00	287.0
Floating-point performance	240 gflops	no data
Gigaflops	360	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTS 250M and GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	large
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
SLI options	+	no data
MXM Type	MXM 3.0 Type-B	no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	Up to 2000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s	320.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	HDMIVGALVDSSingle Link DVIDisplayPortDual Link DVI	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management

8.0

no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.5
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	+	8.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTS 250M 1.43

RTX 3070 Mobile 37.09
+2494%

RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms GTS 250M by 2494% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTS 250M 553

RTX 3070 Mobile 14364
+2497%

RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms GTS 250M by 2497% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTS 250M 3659

RTX 3070 Mobile 77148
+2008%

RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms GTS 250M by 2008% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	28 −318%	117 +318%
1440p	2−3 −3750%	77 +3750%
4K	1−2 −4800%	49 +4800%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−2875%

119
+2875%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	65−70
Battlefield 5	0−1	100−110
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −910%	100−110 +910%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −2575%	107 +2575%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −18800%	189 +18800%
Hitman 3	2−3 −7300%	148 +7300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −9200%	93 +9200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −2600%	108 +2600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −1900%	140 +1900%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	65−70
Battlefield 5	0−1	134
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −910%	100−110 +910%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −2100%	88 +2100%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −18700%	188 +18700%
Hitman 3	2−3 −6800%	138 +6800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −8300%	84 +8300%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −4750%	97 +4750%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −1550%	66 +1550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −1629%	121 +1629%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −4150%	170 +4150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	65−70
Battlefield 5	0−1	126
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1750%	74 +1750%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −16600%	167 +16600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −2250%	94 +2250%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −1933%	60−65 +1933%
Hitman 3	4−5 −2350%	98 +2350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −600%	63 +600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	38
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −1680%	89 +1680%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −4600%	47 +4600%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −4450%	91 +4450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −2500%	50−55 +2500%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1550%	30−35 +1550%
Hitman 3	2−3 −1750%	35−40 +1750%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −143%	17 +143%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	24

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	24−27
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	33
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1600%	51 +1600%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −1060%	58 +1060%

This is how GTS 250M and RTX 3070 Mobile compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

RTX 3070 Mobile is 318% faster than GTS 250M

1440p resolution:

RTX 3070 Mobile is 3750% faster than GTS 250M

4K resolution:

RTX 3070 Mobile is 4800% faster than GTS 250M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3070 Mobile is 18800% faster than the GTS 250M.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 3070 Mobile surpassed GTS 250M in all 32 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	1.43	37.09
Recency	15 June 2009	4 January 2021
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	28 Watt	125 Watt