Radeon HD 8310E vs GeForce GTS 240 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1179
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.47
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameG92BKalindi
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 July 2009 (16 years ago)23 April 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores112128
Core clock speed675 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors754 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate37.802.400
Floating-point processing power0.3629 TFLOPS0.0768 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs568

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length229 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1100 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth70.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.3
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2009 23 April 2013
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 25 Watt

HD 8310E has an age advantage of 3 years, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 380% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTS 240 OEM and Radeon HD 8310E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTS 240 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 8310E is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
AMD Radeon HD 8310E
Radeon HD 8310E

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 33 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 240 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 30 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8310E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTS 240 OEM or Radeon HD 8310E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.