Quadro FX 3000G vs GeForce GTS 240 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameG92BNV35
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 July 2009 (16 years ago)22 July 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores112no data
Core clock speed675 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors754 million135 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Wattno data
Texture fill rate37.803.200
Floating-point processing power0.3629 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs568
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Length229 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1100 MHz425 MHz
Memory bandwidth70.4 GB/s27.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0a
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2009 22 July 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 130 nm

GTS 240 OEM has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 136.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTS 240 OEM and Quadro FX 3000G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTS 240 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Quadro FX 3000G is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000G
Quadro FX 3000G

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 37 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 240 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTS 240 OEM or Quadro FX 3000G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.