GeForce RTX 5070 vs GTS 240 OEM
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 19 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 20 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 73.95 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 21.17 |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025) |
| GPU code name | G92B | GB205 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 July 2009 (16 years ago) | 4 March 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $549 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 112 | 6144 |
| Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 2325 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2512 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 754 million | 31,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 37.80 | 482.3 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.3629 TFLOPS | 30.87 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 80 |
| TMUs | 56 | 192 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 192 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 48 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | 245 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR7 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB/s | 672.0 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.4 |
| CUDA | 1.1 | 10.1 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 July 2009 | 4 March 2025 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 12 GB |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 250 Watt |
GTS 240 OEM has 108.3% lower power consumption.
RTX 5070, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTS 240 OEM and GeForce RTX 5070. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
