ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs GeForce GTS 160M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking996not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.08no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameG94RV535
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 March 2009 (17 years ago)5 November 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64no data
Core clock speed600 MHz587 MHz
Number of transistors505 million330 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt44 Watt
Texture fill rate19.202.348
Floating-point processing power0.192 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops288no data
ROPs164
TMUs324
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options2-way-
MXM TypeMXM 3.0 Type-Bno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 800 MHz695 MHz
Memory bandwidth51 GB/s22.24 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsVGADisplayPortDual Link DVIHDMILVDSSingle Link DVI1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL2.12.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2009 5 November 2007
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 44 Watt

GTS 160M has an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 23% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1700 FSC, on the other hand, has 36% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon X1700 FSC. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTS 160M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1700 FSC is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 6 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 160M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X1700 FSC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTS 160M or Radeon X1700 FSC, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.