Riva TNT2 Ultra vs GeForce GTS 150M
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1098 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 2.07 | no data |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Fahrenheit (1998−2000) |
| GPU code name | G94 | NV5 B5 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 3 March 2009 (17 years ago) | 15 March 1999 (27 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $299 |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 64 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 150 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 505 million | 15 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 250 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 12.80 | 0.3 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.128 TFLOPS | no data |
| Gigaflops | 192 | no data |
| ROPs | 16 | 2 |
| TMUs | 32 | 2 |
| L2 Cache | 64 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
| SLI options | 2-way | - |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | SDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 32 MB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | Up to 800 MHz | 183 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51 GB/s | 2.928 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | DisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVILVDSSingle Link DVIVGA | 1x VGA, 2x S-Video |
| HDMI | + | - |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Power management | 8.0 | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 6.0 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | no data |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 March 2009 | 15 March 1999 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 250 nm |
GTS 150M has an age advantage of 9 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 285% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTS 150M and Riva TNT2 Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GTS 150M is a notebook graphics card while Riva TNT2 Ultra is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
