Radeon PRO W7800 vs GeForce GTS 150 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated28
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data13.34
Power efficiencyno data19.48
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameG92Navi 31
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date10 March 2009 (17 years ago)13 April 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1284480
Core clock speed738 MHz1895 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2525 MHz
Number of transistors754 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)141 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate47.23707.0
Floating-point processing power0.47 TFLOPS45.25 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs64280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70
L0 Cacheno data2.2 MB
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cache64 KB6 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm280 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 March 2009 13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 141 Watt 260 Watt

GTS 150 OEM has 84% lower power consumption.

PRO W7800, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTS 150 OEM and Radeon PRO W7800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTS 150 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Radeon PRO W7800 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 17 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 150 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 40 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTS 150 OEM or Radeon PRO W7800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.