ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 vs GeForce GT 820M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1071not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.56no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGF117M72
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date27 November 2013 (12 years ago)14 May 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9640
Core clock speed775 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors585 million180 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate12.401.800
Floating-point processing power0.2976 TFLOPS0.036 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs164
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 November 2013 14 May 2007
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm

GT 820M has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 820M and Mobility Radeon HD 2400. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
GeForce GT 820M
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
Mobility Radeon HD 2400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 140 votes

Rate GeForce GT 820M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 16 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 820M or Mobility Radeon HD 2400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.