NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M vs Intel HD Graphics 630

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

HD Graphics 630
3.09
+109%

HD Graphics 630 outperforms GeForce GT 820M by 109% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking715933
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.080.02
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 Kaby Lake (2015−2017)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameKaby-Lake-H-GT2GF117
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 January 2017 (7 years old)27 November 2013 (10 years old)
Current price$370 $310
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD Graphics 630 has 300% better value for money than GT 820M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2496
Core clock speed300 MHz775 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate26.4012.40
Floating-point performance441.6 gflops297.6 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 2.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4DDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDAno data2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 630 3.09
+109%
GT 820M 1.48

HD Graphics 630 outperforms GeForce GT 820M by 109% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD Graphics 630 1197
+109%
GT 820M 573

HD Graphics 630 outperforms GeForce GT 820M by 109% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
+114%
7−8
−114%
1440p64
+113%
30−35
−113%
4K13
+117%
6−7
−117%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5
+150%
2−3
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry 5 6
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 5
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Hitman 3 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5
+150%
2−3
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Hitman 3 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Metro Exodus 2 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Hitman 3 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Hitman 3 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

This is how HD Graphics 630 and GT 820M compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • HD Graphics 630 is 114% faster than GT 820M

1440p resolution:

  • HD Graphics 630 is 113% faster than GT 820M

4K resolution:

  • HD Graphics 630 is 117% faster than GT 820M

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 3.09 1.48
Recency 1 January 2017 27 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

The HD Graphics 630 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 820M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 630
HD Graphics 630
NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
GeForce GT 820M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1039 votes

Rate Intel HD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 105 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.