UHD Graphics 920 vs GeForce GT 755M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking551not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.13no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameN14P-?Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed980 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors2x 1300 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x ~50 Watt15 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x1

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GBno data
Memory bus width2x 128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed5400 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112.0 (12_1)
OpenGLno data4.6
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 15 Watt

GT 755M SLI has 650% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics 920, on the other hand, has a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 755M SLI and UHD Graphics 920. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 755M SLI is a notebook graphics card while UHD Graphics 920 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI
GeForce GT 755M SLI
Intel UHD Graphics 920
UHD Graphics 920

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 23 votes

Rate GeForce GT 755M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 85 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 755M SLI or UHD Graphics 920, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.