Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs GeForce GT 755M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking540not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.09no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameN14P-?Amethyst
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)5 May 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682048
Core clock speed980 MHz909 MHz
Number of transistors2x 1300 Million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x ~50 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data116.4
Floating-point processing powerno data3.723 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5400 MHz1365 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data174.7 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2013 5 May 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 250 Watt

GT 755M SLI has 12400% lower power consumption.

R9 M395X Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 755M SLI and Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI
GeForce GT 755M SLI
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce GT 755M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 755M SLI or Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.