Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics vs GeForce GT 755M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking562not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.18no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameN14P-?Beema
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 November 2013 (12 years ago)23 February 2016 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76864
Core clock speed980 MHz497 MHz
Boost clock speedno data600 MHz
Number of transistors2x 1300 Million930 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x ~50 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data3.976
Floating-point processing powerno data0.06362 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2x 128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed5400 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.5 (6.0)
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.2.170
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2013 23 February 2016
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 15 Watt

GT 755M SLI has 650% lower power consumption.

R1E Mobile Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 755M SLI and Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 23 votes

Rate GeForce GT 755M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 755M SLI or Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.