ATI Radeon 7000 vs GeForce GT 755M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5561600
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.17no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameN14P-?RV100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 November 2013 (12 years ago)19 February 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed980 MHz183 MHz
Number of transistors2x 1300 Million30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x ~50 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.55
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data3

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GB32 MB
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed5400 MHz183 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.928 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX117.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Fortnite 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 5 24−27 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 no data
Valorant 80−85 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Dota 2 60−65 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Fortnite 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 5 24−27 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 no data
Metro Exodus 16−18 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 no data
Valorant 80−85 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Dota 2 60−65 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 no data
Valorant 80−85 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 45−50 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11 no data
Metro Exodus 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 no data
Valorant 90−95 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 no data
Far Cry 5 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4 no data
Metro Exodus 3−4 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 no data
Valorant 40−45 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10 no data
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 30−33 no data
Far Cry 5 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2013 19 February 2001
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 23 Watt

GT 755M SLI has an age advantage of 12 years, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 1050% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 755M SLI and Radeon 7000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 755M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 7000 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI
GeForce GT 755M SLI
ATI Radeon 7000
Radeon 7000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 23 votes

Rate GeForce GT 755M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 200 votes

Rate Radeon 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 755M SLI or Radeon 7000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.